*Fifteen Properties, Four NFF Officials- And A Public Record Still Askibg For Closure
๐Y PAUL LUCKY OKOKU
How many properties were involved?
What were they?
What did the anti-corruption agencies actually do?
Were the properties merely marked or seized for investigation?
Was ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ obtained?
Was there ever ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐?
Were the owners ultimately cleared?
Those are the questions that should guide this discussion.
Not rumour.
Not internet estimates of personal wealth.
Not assumptions.
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฌ. ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ซ๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฌ. ๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ. ๐๐จ๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ.
According to publicly reported ๐๐๐๐ records from ๐๐๐ฉ๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐๐๐, no fewer than ๐๐ข๐๐ญ๐๐๐ง (๐๐) ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ connected with ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ ๐จ๐จ๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง officials were seized or placed under investigation during an anti-corruption probe.
The four officials named in that public record were then-NFF President ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ข๐๐ค, NFF General Secretary ๐๐ซ. ๐๐จ๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข, NFF Second Vice-President ๐๐ก๐๐ก๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ค๐ค๐จ, and NFF Technical Committee official ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ก.
Contemporary reporting gave the breakdown as:
- ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ข๐๐ค โ ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ.
- ๐๐จ๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข โ ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ.
- ๐๐ก๐๐ก๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ค๐ค๐จ โ ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ.
- ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ก โ ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ.
That makes ๐๐ข๐๐ญ๐๐๐ง (๐๐) ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ in all.
The ๐๐๐๐ investigation did not remain a vague headline.
According to the public record, the Commission identified specific properties.
For ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ข๐๐ค, the reported properties included a mansion in ๐๐๐ซ๐ค๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฐ ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐, ๐๐ค๐จ๐ฒ๐ข, ๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ฌ; a bungalow in ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข; the ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐ in Warri; a bungalow in ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐, ๐๐ฌ๐๐๐; an apartment at ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ณ๐, ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ก ๐๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐จ๐ง; and ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐, ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฃ๐, with a reported Right of Occupancy dated ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐.
For ๐๐จ๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข, the reported properties included a house near ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฐ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฐ-๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐, ๐๐จ๐ค๐จ๐ญ๐จ; ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฃ๐; and a property at ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐๐ซ ๐๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ, ๐๐จ๐ง๐ ๐, ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฃ๐.
For ๐๐ก๐๐ก๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ค๐ค๐จ, the public record identified a mansion at ๐๐จ. ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ, ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐, ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฃ๐; ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข; a property at ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ค๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐, ๐๐๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐ข, ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ง๐; and ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐ญ๐๐ค๐จ.
For ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ก, contemporaneous reporting identified two bungalows in ๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐, ๐๐ข๐ ๐๐ซ ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ โ one on ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ off ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ค ๐๐จ๐๐ and another in ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐จ ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐.
The Commissionโs spokesperson, ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ญ ๐๐ค๐จ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐, was also reported as saying that ๐๐๐๐ intended to apply to court for ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ of the properties while investigations continued, and that ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ could be sought if the evidence ultimately supported it.
That distinction is critical.
๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ข๐ณ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐.
๐๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐.
๐๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.
And that is precisely why the public deserves to know how each matter ended.
The identification of ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ connected to ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ ๐ ๐จ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ฌ raised serious questions requiring documentary answers.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง?
๐๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐๐ก, ๐ข๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ, ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐๐?
The answers must come from the investigating authorities and the courts.
Nigerians deserve the complete record, not merely the original announcement.
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Later court material concerning ๐๐ก๐๐ก๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ค๐ค๐จ demonstrates why journalists and researchers must follow these matters beyond the original seizure headline.
๐๐ข๐ค๐ค๐จ challenged ๐๐๐๐โ๐ฌ action.
According to an ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ judgment, his case included the contention that the Commission had sought forfeiture of several properties, but that the court had observed that only one of the properties at issue had been acquired after the relevant NFF office date. The court record also recounts ๐๐ข๐ค๐ค๐จโ๐ฌ position that an earlier forfeiture motion had been withdrawn and that ๐๐๐๐ subsequently marked his ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐ property as being under investigation without a subsisting forfeiture order.
Separately, ๐๐ข๐ค๐ค๐จโ๐ฌ lawyers later told the media that the property matter had been ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ค ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ก ๐, ๐๐๐๐, maintaining that the properties predated his NFF tenure. The same later reporting said an ๐๐๐๐ source maintained that investigations involving other NFF officials remained ongoing.
That is exactly why the language must remain precise.
The ๐๐๐๐ seizure was real.
The subsequent legal challenge was real.
The later claimed court outcome must also be recorded.
Accountability cannot preserve only the damaging headline and discard the later defense or court development.
๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
Separate from the ๐๐๐๐ property investigation was the prosecution identified as ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐ ๐๐จ. ๐ ๐๐/๐๐/๐๐/๐๐๐/๐๐๐๐.
On ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐, according to the public record, the ๐๐ ๐๐ arraigned three NFF officials before the ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ in ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐, ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฃ๐:
- ๐๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ฉ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐๐ง๐๐๐ค๐ข๐ง, then ๐๐ข๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐;
- ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ง ๐๐๐ค๐, then ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐๐ซ; and
- ๐ ๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐ข ๐๐๐ฆ๐ณ๐, then ๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ.
They faced allegations concerning ๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฌ.
๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฒ.
The case was widely described as involving approximately ๐๐$๐.๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ง in FIFA grant money.
The ๐๐ ๐๐ later sought to add ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ข๐๐ค and ๐๐จ๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข as defendants.
On ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐๐๐๐ง refused that application.
According to the publicly reported ruling, the court considered the proposed joinder an ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ in light of overlapping proceedings and the fact that ๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ข๐๐ค and ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข had earlier been listed as witnesses. The trial against the original three defendants was to continue.
That must be stated accurately:
๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ข๐๐ค ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ .
That is not a conviction.
It is not an acquittal on the underlying allegations in that particular case either.
It is a ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ , and it should be reported as such.
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐
Another proceeding โ brought by the now-defunct ๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ฒ (๐๐๐๐) โ named ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ข๐๐ค, ๐๐จ๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข, ๐๐๐ฒ๐ข ๐๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฆ๐ข, ๐๐ก๐๐ก๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ค๐ค๐จ and ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐.
According to the ๐ ๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ record reported on ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ซ ๐, ๐๐๐๐, the case involved ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ and allegations concerning approximately ๐๐$๐.๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ง and โฆ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ง, along with conflict-of-interest and asset-declaration issues.
The ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฒ-๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง took over the matter and applied to withdraw the charges, stating that the available proof of evidence could not sustain them.
๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ subsequently ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ the five defendants.
That outcome belongs prominently in this article.
If we report the investigation, we report the clearance.
If we report the allegation, we report the acquittal.
That is fairness.
But the acquittal in the ๐๐๐๐ proceeding did not automatically answer every separate ๐๐๐๐ property question or every separate ๐๐ ๐๐ proceeding.
That distinction is essential.
๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐?
This is where the research reaches its most important unanswered question.
According to the public record, ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ were seized or placed under investigation in ๐๐๐๐.
The ๐๐๐๐ said it intended to pursue ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐.
But I have not yet located an authoritative final record establishing that these ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ โ individually or collectively โ became subject to ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐.
Nor have I located an official property-by-property public schedule showing:
- which properties were released;
- which remained restrained;
- which were subject to interim forfeiture;
- which, if any, were finally forfeited;
- and what official valuation was assigned to each.
That does not prove wrongdoing.
It does not prove innocence.
It proves something much simpler:
๐๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐.
And that is where the institutions responsible for accountability should step in.
If the properties were released, publish the orders.
If the investigation was closed, publish the closure.
If anyone was cleared, record the clearance.
If forfeiture was obtained, identify the property and court order.
If prosecution was discontinued, state when and why.
If proceedings remain alive, tell Nigerians where they stand.
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
A public investigation creates a public responsibility to explain the ending.
The properties were identified.
The houses were marked.
The agencies spoke.
The courts became involved.
Years passed.
Now Nigerians are entitled to ask:
๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐-๐๐-๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐?
No assumptions.
No speculation.
No trial by social media.
Just the documents.
๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐๐๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ค๐ฒ ๐๐ค๐จ๐ค๐ฎ
FIFA Legend | Former Nigeria Flying Eagles Vice-Captain | Former Super Eagles International | AFCON Silver Medalist | Football Historian | Football Analyst | Investigative Football Writer | Journalist-at-Large | Founder & CEO, Greater Tomorrow Childrenโs Fund (GTCF)